Categorias
Apologética Cristã Religião

What a Hell !!

The Nature and Duration of Punishment

The Nature of Hell/ The Nature and Duration of Punishment

Russel, the founder of JW, was sixteen years old when he became a skeptic because he couldn’t accept the doctrine of hell. 1 In 1879 Russel attended a lecture on hell given by Advent Christian Church leader Jonas Wendell. Relieved that there was no eternal conscious punishment Russel’s faith in the Bible was restored. 2

Professor Allan Gomez says that the discussion on the annihilationist’s arguments against the doctrine of eternal conscious punishment for the wicked revolves around only two main points:

Does the wicked experience conscious torment? and Do they suffer this torment eternally?

He says: “But I believe that there are two sets of texts that answer these two questions conclusively. One set of passages comes from Matthew 25; the other verses come from the Book of Revelation 14:9-11; 20:10 3

“The Nature of Hell (Matthew 25:41, 46)

[v. 41] “Then He will also say to those on His left, ‘Depart from me, accursed ones, into the eternal fire [to pur to aionion] which has been prepared for the devil and his angels….’ [v. 46] And these will go away into eternal punishment [kolasin aionion], but the righteous into life eternal [zoen aionion].” 4

We observe first of all that the wicked share the same fate as Satan and his demonic hosts. Indeed, this text tells us that hell was created specifically for Satan and his angels. As followers of Satan, impenitent men will meet the same fate as he. This is significant because when we look at other passages in the Book of Revelation that speak of the Devil’s fate (see below), we are fully justified in ascribing this same fate to unredeemed men.” Notice that this passage describes hell as a place of “eternal fire.” Should we understand this to mean literal, material, and physical fire? Or should we regard the expression as metaphorical language, designed to convey an awful spiritual reality through physical language? Most conservatives — who affirm the doctrine of eternal, conscious punishment — would say that this is metaphorical language. For one thing, the rich man in Luke 16:24 is described as being in agony in the flames. He is also described as having a tongue, and Lazarus is said to have a finger. But this scene occurs in Hades, during the disembodied state between death and resurrection. It is therefore difficult to see how a nonphysical being could have a literal tongue, much less be tormented by literal, physical fire. The same would apply to the other physical metaphors used to describe hell, such as the undying worm (Mark 9:48) and the chains of darkness (Jude 6). 5

The Nature of Punishment (Revelation 14:9-11; 20:10)

[14:9] “…If anyone worships the beast and his image… [14:10] he will be tormented [basanisthesetai] with fire and brimstone in the presence of the holy angels and in the presence of the Lamb. [14:11] And the smoke of their torment [basanismou] goes up forever and ever [eis aionas aionon]; and they have no rest day or night, those who worship the beast and his image,… [20:10] And the Devil who deceived them was thrown into the lake of fire and brimstone, where the beast and the false prophet are also; and they will be tormented [basanisthesontai] day and night forever and ever [eis tous aionas ton aionon].” 6

These texts describe the nature of the punishment as “torment.” The words used in these texts are forms of the Greek word basanizo. As Thayer states, basanizo means “to vex with grievous pains (of body or mind), to torment.” Likewise, Arndt and Gingrich say that basanizo means “to torture, torment,” and may apply to either physical or mental vexation. When we examine the uses of the verb basanizo and its various noun forms throughout the New Testament, we see that great pain and conscious misery are in view, not annihilation or cessation of consciousness. For example, the centurion’s sick servant is grievously tormented (deinos basanizomenos) by his palsy (Matt. 8:6). Revelation 12:2 uses the verb to describe the pains of childbirth. In 2 Peter 2:8, righteous Lot is described as tormented (ebasanizen) in his soul by the wicked deeds of the Sodomites. In Luke 16:23 and 28, the plural noun “torments” (basanoi) is used to describe the rich man’s conscious suffering in Hades. Indeed, in verse 28 Hades is described as “the place of torment” (ho topos tou basanou). 7

The Duration of Punishment in Revelation

When we considered Matthew 25:46 above, we noted that aionos can, in some contexts, qualify nouns of limited duration. (Though, as we also observed, the context of Matthew 25 demands that we take aionios in its unlimited signification there.) But here, we find the emphatic forms eis aionas aionon and eis tous aionas ton aionon (“unto the ages of the ages”). This construction is only used to describe unending duration. As Sasse points out, the “twofold use of the term [aionios]” is designed “to emphasize the concept of eternity.” The fact that the forms used are plural in number further reinforces the idea of never-ending duration. Speaking of the Greek construction in this verse, the great biblical commentator R. C. H. Lenski observes: “The strongest expression for our ‘forever’ is eis tous aionan ton aionon, ‘for the eons of eons’; many aeons, each of vast duration, are multiplied by many more, which we imitate by ‘forever and ever.’ Human language is able to use only temporal terms to express what is altogether beyond time and timeless. The Greek takes its greatest term for time, the eon, pluralizes this, and then multiplies it by its own plural, even using articles which make these eons the definite ones.” 8

This same emphatic construction is found in Revelation 1:6; 4:9; and 5:3, where it refers to the unending worship of God. Revelation 4:10 and 10:6 it is used to describe God’s own endless life. And in Revelation 22:5 the construction is employed to characterize the everlasting reign of the saints. 9

Note also that the unending nature of the torment is shown by the fact that the expression “day and night” is used to describe its duration. The expression “day and night” is indicative of ceaseless activity. This same phrase is used of the never-ending worship of God in Revelation 4:8 and 7:15. By juxtaposing the words “day and night” with “forever and ever” in 20:10, we have the most emphatic expression of unending, ceaseless activity possible in the Greek language. In summary, these verses from Matthew and Revelation are more than adequate to answer the two questions before us. The language is unambiguous, emphatic, and conclusive. These verses by themselves should be sufficient to settle the argument forever. 10

Jesus more than anyone annunciated the doctrine of everlasting torment for the lost. He was a perfect manifestation of love and justice and stooped to become one of us and bore the vengeance of God’s fire. If God should open our eyes to understand the terrible price He paid, we would in that instant comprehend the awful guilt of spurning that price. If those who scorned the old covenant were consumed with the fire of this present age, “how much severer punishment do you think he will deserve who has trampled underfoot the Son of God and has regarded as unclean the blood of the covenant” (Heb. 10:29)? 11

Professor Jones in his book “Why God Allows Evil” says that occupants of hell will remain eternally unrepentant and it is consistent with the Scriptures. Why should we think they will ever repent? When God’s wrath is poured out on the wicked in Revelation 16:9, we read that “they were seared with intense heat and they cursed the name of God, who had control over the plagues, but they refused to repent and glorify Him” 12

It seems that Russel’s sentimentalism assumed that in heaven our feelings about others will be as present and our joy in the manifesting of God’s justice will be no greater than it is now, says Professor Gomez.  

These arguments clearly refute JW’s arguments. What do you think?

  1. Robert Bowman, Jehovah’s Witnesses (Grand Rapids: Zondervan, 1995), 9.[]
  2. Ibid., 10.[]
  3. http://www.bible-researcher.com/hell4.html[]
  4. Ibid.,[]
  5. Ibid.,[]
  6. http://www.bible-researcher.com/hell4.html[]
  7. Ibid.,[]
  8. Ibid.,[]
  9. Ibid.,[]
  10. http://www.bible-researcher.com/hell4.html[]
  11. Ibid.,[]
  12. Jones, Why God Allows Evil (Oregon: Harvest, 2017), 99[]
Categorias
Apologética Cristã Religião História

Understanding Inerrancy of Bible

The doctrine of Inerrancy has been long an emphatic affirmation of the Christian theological tradition in both Catholics and Protestants. 1 But it has been looked at with considerable suspicion starting from the first decades of the twenty-first century, many skeptics considered the doctrine as a shibboleth.

But if the Bible contains errors then Christians are faced with a bigger problem. What is true and what is not true in the Bible? What is at stake is the shipwreck of our faith. How can we trust Paul and the others when they wrote that God resurrected Jesus from the dead? How can we believe that God will keep his promises if he could not keep his Word true through the centuries?

I don’t think that the inerrancy was a theory that was developed through the centuries but Jesus and the apostles themselves looked upon the entire truthfulness and utter worthiness of the Scripture. 2 I understand that the inerrancy of the Bible is that the Bible does not contain errors.

The authors inspired by the Holy Spirit wrote exactly what God wanted. The text we have today is what the Holy Spirit inspired the authors to write. God revealed Himself through special revelations that were given directly from Him. These revelations were recorded in books as God told his prophets to do so, like in Jeremiah 30:2. “Write in a book all the words I have spoken to you”. Paul wrote in 2 Timothy 3:16-17 “All Scripture is God-breathed (Gk. theopneustos).

Paul Wegner explains that this process is not just that God breathed life into the words of an author after he had written them; if this was the case, they would be primarily man’s words. 3 God was intimately involved in the lives of the authors that He knew what they would say and even how they would say it. 4 The individual personalities were thus combined with the indwelling, guiding work of the Holy Spirit to Create Scripture. 5

My understanding of the relationship of inerrancy to the doctrines of inspiration and infallibility is that the infallibility of Scripture does not rest on the infallibility of the human writers but on the integrity of God. 6 Because God is perfect, His Word is perfect and Scripture is perfect. It takes into account God’s character and the nature of his dealings with humans in the world. God used imperfect faulty men to write His Words but inspiration is not the elimination of all human involvement in the production of Scripture. Yet, the critical biblical affirmation of the inspiration is of the inspiration of the text. 7

So, God used fallible and faulty human beings and words as his own words. While inspiration and inerrancy are not synonyms, God is not a man that he should lie (Numbers 23:19). The text is God-breathed and it is the unfailing veracity of God that gives a truthful character to the text. 8 We don’t need to solve all difficulties in the Bible but it doesn’t mean it is not true, perhaps we need more time studying it.

The purpose of the Bible is to bring us in fellowship with Christ. 9 God created the human language and there is no reason why genuinely human language or a genuinely human text must be fallible or contain errors. 10 When difficulties arise, it is an invitation to engage in Scripture that is unfailingly true and always speaks and acts in accordance with the nature of God. 11

Joel M Stevao

  1. James K. Hoffmeier and Dennis R. Magary, Do Historical Matters Matter to Faith? (Illinois: Crossway, 2012),71.[]
  2. James K. Hoffmeier and Dennis R. Magary, Do Historical Matters Matter to Faith? (Illinois: Crossway, 2012),77.[]
  3. Paul G Wegner, The Journey from Text to Translations: The Origin and Development of the Bible (Baker: Grand Rapids, 2004), 29.[]
  4. Ibid.,29.[]
  5. Ibid.,29.[]
  6. James K. Hoffmeier and Dennis R. Magary, Do Historical Matters Matter to Faith? (Illinois: Crossway, 2012),84.[]
  7. Ibid.,95.[]
  8. Ibid.,96.[]
  9. Ibid.,97.[]
  10. Ibid.,94.[]
  11. Ibid.,97.[]
Categorias
Apologética Cristã Religião

A Vitória da Cruz

O Servo de Deus foi Bem Sucedido na sua Missão

Em 2015, escrevi um texto criticando as palavras do Papa Francisco, quando em sua visita aos Estados Unidos na época, afirmou que Jesus havia falhado na cruz, assim nós também podíamos falhar. Mas não é isso que a Bíblia fala da morte de Jesus na Cruz; e eu respondi ao Papa dizendo que ele estava errado.

Nossas falhas e pecados podem ser perdoados, porque Jesus não falhou na cruz.

Alguns criticaram o texto, dizendo que talvez eu tivesse entendido errado, inclusive alguns líderes religiosos concordaram com o Papa, numa tentativa de amenizar as palavras do pontífice. (O texto está na net com o título “O Fracasso ou a Vitória da Cruz”). https://apologian.blogspot.com/2015/09/o-fracasso-da-cruz-ou-vitoria-da-cruz.html 1

Na “teologia” do Papa, Jesus, na sua natureza humana falhou na cruz, porque ele morreu na cruz, então por ele ter fracassado na cruz, nós também podemos fracassar. Além da falta de base bíblica para tal posição, como mostrei no primeiro texto, (O Fracasso ou a Vitória da Cruz) pretendo mostrar o que Deus disse com relação ao seu “Servo” Jesus e seu sacrifício na cruz.

No meu Texto "O fracasso ou a Vitória da Cruz", usei o Novo Testamento para mostrar que Jesus não falhou na cruz. Neste texto vou mostrar, pelo Velho Testamento, que Jesus foi bem sucedido na sua missão e não falhou como o papa Francisco afirmou.

Quando fazemos uma exegese do texto em Isaías (52:13 – 53:12) que fala do sofrimento e glória do Servo do Senhor, descobrimos que o próprio Deus afirma que seu Servo seria bem sucedido na sua missão.

O Servo do Senhor apresentado em Isaías 52:13 - 53:12, descreve o sofrimento do Messias. Esse texto fala de como Ele estava desfigurado, não tinha formosura, foi desprezado, tomou sobre si as nossas iniquidades, foi oprimido e humilhado, entre outras coisas.

Quando lemos 52:13: “Vede, o meu servo procederá com prudência, será engrandecido e elevado e muito sublime”, (ARC) e em outra tradução: “Vejam, o meu servo agirá com sabedoria, será engrandecido, elevado e muitíssimo elevado.” (NIV)Temos aí a figura perfeita do Messias que é Jesus.

No original em hebraico, as palavras “prudência” ou “sabedoria” é sakal , que também quer dizer “ter sucesso, ou ser bem sucedido”; depois o texto diz “será engrandecido” que em Hebraico é rum quer dizer “ser levantado, indicando início”; e o texto ainda diz “elevado”, que é nasa em Hebraico indicando ascender, num sentido de continuação e finalmente “muitíssimo elevado” que é gabah, que indica “ser exaltado” onde o “e” antes de muitíssimo elevado em hebraico, é chamado de “waw consecutive”, indicando sequência.

Em outra versão diz assim: "Vejam, o meu servo agirá com sabedoria, será engrandecido, elevado e muitíssimo elevado". (NIV)

Portanto, o que temos aqui é Deus falando que seu Servo agirá com prudência ou sabedoria e será bem sucedido (sakal). E o resultado ou prova disso é que Ele será engrandecido ou levantado (rum), referindo-se a sua ressurreição; Ele será elevado (nasa), que se refere a sua ascensão e será muitíssimo exaltado (gabah) que se refere ao seu estado final, num clímax da sequência de eventos.

No verso 14, encontramos a palavra “shaman” que significa ficar “sem palavras ou não ter o que falar”, devido à cena terrível, pois Ele não parecia humano. No verso 15, encontramos a palavra “naza“ ou aspergir” que é a mesma palavra usada no Velho Testamento, quando o sacrifício era feito e o sangue era "aspergido" para a expiação do pecado. Este servo morreria, ressuscitaria, sofreria e aspergeria o seu sangue para a limpeza das nações, trazendo salvação para o mundo inteiro e, finalmente, os reis do mundo fechariam as suas bocas e adorariam o Rei, quando então entendessem o que o servo fez. 2 Em Jesus temos o cumprimento dessa profecia.

Concluindo, temos Deus (Yahweh) dizendo que seu Servo SERIA bem sucedido e que FOI bem sucedido na sua missão. O Servo cumpriu o trabalho que Deus lhe deu, morrendo na cruz pelos nossos pecados (53:10-12), o Servo triunfará (v10), devido ao seu ato prudente muitos serão justificados (v11) e, porque ele levou nossos pecados, Ele será exaltado. (v12).

Encontramos nesse texto em Isaías (52:13 – 53:12), não somente a profecia, mas o cumprimento da profecia, escritos aproximadamente 700 anos antes.

Portanto, com toda certeza, podemos dizer que Jesus não falhou na cruz, pois o próprio Deus disse que seu filho Jesus não falharia na Cruz.

E conhecereis a verdade, e ela os libertará. (João 8:32)

Joel M Stevao
Apologista Cristão

  1. https://apologian.blogspot.com/2015/09/o-fracasso-da-cruz-ou-vitoria-da-cruz.html[]
  2. Bruce Waltke, Ph.D. professor de Grego e Velho Testament no Biola University. (Understanding the Old Testament), 89 []
pt_BRPortuguese